Liberal, or anti-Liberal ...
I'm preparing for a long time, and now I'm mature.
Despite the global pandemic crisis, other activities are taking place around the world. Liberal forces have become very active, fighting as their "minority" for their rights with the "majority" completely discriminating against them. Yes, yes ... That's the paradox. Fighting discrimination turns out to be only possible by discriminating against others.
That's how it started in the USA with "Black matter lives", when suddenly everyone "white" had to stand on his knees and kiss his feet there. Why "keep it"? Because I don't know exactly how to label it. Today's politically correct "African Americans" are far from correct or accurate, as they represent a very narrow ethnic group. My school teaches that there are Europeans in Europe, Asians in Asia, Aborigines in Australia and Negroes in Africa. And not some "afro something". Because why in Europe are the 2015 refugees from Somalia, Libya, Morocco called "African Americans", even though they don't even know where such America is? But you see, someone didn't like it, and ... The minority didn't like it, so the majority accepted it as a dogma. Although ... This is exactly the issue that could still be discussed - who is a minority and who is a majority. But maybe that's why it has all become a tradition.
A month ago, I learned that there was such a "celebrity", blogger Didrihsone. She had published her opinion on non-traditional relations, for which she really deserved public condemnation. But looking at her statements, I did not find anything condemning in them, because a person simply openly said what he understands and what he thinks, without calling for violence or any resistance. And I supported this "celebrity" because in many ways her opinion coincided with mine. And I posted it on Facebook. And you know? After about half an hour, I received a notice that my account was being blocked because my opinion did not agree with the FB company's guidelines. I did not accept this, and when I started talking to FB robots, I forced this "artificial" intellect to connect me to the ordinary, and after half an hour FB was forced to admit that in my opinion there is absolutely no call for violence, no racial condemnation, no groups condemnation or other overt discrimination, and my profile remained untouched, both with the indication that if I allowed myself to do something wrong, it would be everything. And for the sake of peace, FB asked me to delete my message, which FB himself did quickly ... So what had I written like that? I quote: "I also have homosexuality incomprehensible, so I do not support it." No more, no less. However, the relevant characters, who are so "discriminated against", hastily filed a complaint with FB that I see them turning against them with hatred, violence, calling for something ... And here, as a lawyer, I have a question for these characters - don't you think that you discriminate against heterosexuals?
Each of us is a unique individual who integrates into society. And only we ourselves and God know all our fetishes, passions, hobbies, pros and cons. Is that why the rest of society is bad? No.
Yes, the majority of society consciously or unconsciously creates "polite society" stereotypes that determine norms of behavior. And, of course, not all of these stereotypes may be acceptable to us ALL. Someone does not like to eat holding a fork in his left hand because seeing it is uncomfortable. What to do? Make a brawl and condemn those who do it? Maybe regular speeders get together and hold a pride to advertise total speeding? Maybe thieves and OCGs are marching with the slogan - "Get off with a criminal law"? No, it sees is bad. But to openly advertise your fetish, your tendencies, which are unacceptable to the majority of the public - you see it right, and everyone who expresses dissatisfaction with it - discriminates. But is not imposing discrimination on your position as the only right one? That there are LGBT members? Although I know the answer - everything you do is right, but what we do is wrong. OK, so be it. Let us change society and state that the good tone of society is homosexuality, and that heterosexuality is something very bad, and therefore prohibited. Just again, the question for the same LGBT people - where will you take the babies you really want to adopt? Don't you think that by your actions you are either leading the world to destruction, or do you just want to take on and create an LGBT dictatorship where the heterosexual will be put on some animal level? And don't you think that you are consciously and deliberately creating the conditions to provoke your condemnation? I am afraid you will not want to discuss, because there will be no answers against. There will only be conspiracy theories, '' one aunt said, '' etc., just as we experience now with a pandemic. And by the way - it is you who call for violence, condemnation and hatred.
For example, I am deeply indifferent to who a person is - black, white, blue, green, hetero, bi, or homo. I will pay no attention to his religion or his political position. But until then. And that time and moment comes when someone begins to tell me that I am living wrong, that I do not understand, and that God does not give, it is all presented through uncensored words and personal insults. OK, I understand that for some people the intelligence is not higher than a five-year-old child, and he raises his self-confidence according to the number of uncensored words - it does not offend me, because with such as they say - for good. However, it is then that I realize that someone is trying to force something on me, pull it in somewhere, and close my mouth. I say once - will not succeed. Because, as you know, every action has a countermeasure. I have worked in the same team with a Muslim, a Negro and a homosexual, and I have never had a problem. On the contrary - there were friendly parties, there were interesting discussions on these topics, and the Negro did not offend to be called a Negro, the Muslim did not try to prove superiority over baptism, the gay did not drag me to his bed. But they were neither "Black matter live", nor "IGIL", nor "LGBT". And maybe that's why. And they were respectable people, because I understand that their position and opinion could not be manipulated.
Here are some thoughts. And that's exactly what I want the people in the article to think about - do you really not allow the "discriminated" people to live in peace, or does someone just tell you that and promise to reward you?